|
|
|
|
ALL THOSE SLAVES OF MUSLIMS.
ALL
THOSE SLAVES
OF MUSLIMS. (Muslim’s
Attitude Towards
Humanity). By-fatemolla. A Founder Member of FFI ( Formerly FFF ) (
This
article is dedicated to our writers with different views and visions who taught
us how to debate strongly on religious issues without personal attack
). PURPOSE:
- After the evil event of 9/11, people worldwide became concerned about
Islam’s real attitude towards humanity. Unlike before, Islamic books are
widely read, studied and researched in search of this important aspect of
present and future human global society. In absence of any new revelation or new
Prophet, we can conclude that Islam’s attitude towards humanity today stands
exactly where it stood before 1500 years. The humble purpose of this article is
to evaluate one side of Islam’s attitude towards humanity; keeping in mind
that there is another bright side also. SLAVERY IS MANKIND’S MOST CRUEL INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM THIS PLANET HAS EVER SAW. All the ancient tribes/societies including both of Old and New Testaments recognize and accept the institution of slavery. It takes imagination to realize how many human beings lived worse than death, put to death, and screamed life-long in pain for how many centuries due to slavery. Even in our Bengal we saw many thousands of Bangali slaves in the Arakan Empire and in the slave-markets in Swandeep (Chittagong) run by the Portuguese pirate Sebastian Gonzales, as Ibn Botuta and the Chinese traveler Ma-Huen recorded Among religions it is only Islam that legalized slavery so loudly and clearly. This is the issue where both humanity and divinity of Islam face the greatest challenge ever, much more than any other debate/conflict/contradiction. Maolanas always made desperate efforts to prove Islam’s slave system as much better than that in other societies. Indeed that is true because Islam for the first time laid down some formal structures to comfort the slaves, (with some exception of tribes who banned slavery much before Islam) as shown bellow. Slaves
were continuously generated in huge number for almost a century from hundreds of
Muslim-victories from Arab peninsula to
Egypt-Algeria-Morocco-Tunisia-Tripoli-Cyprus-Iraq-Iran-India-Spain. Maolanas
argue that for the establishment of Islam it had to adopt all of 4 processes
(killing, enslaving, free with ransom and free without ransom) to handle the
huge number of the slaves (REF 1). Prophet (SA) was all along very concerned and
vocal about good behavior to slaves. That only treated the symptom not the
disease. One may wonder while the age-old deep-rooted habit of drinking
(alcohol) could be stopped (in three stages), why the devastating slave-system
was not stopped. A bad system of
Muta’a marriage (“Temporary
Marriage”, which was nothing but legalization of prostitution without caring
about family values/women-dignity) was allowed in the beginning (as a part of
facilitating the Muslim Army in every possible way, one may think).
But during Khybar battle (REF-7 &
26), Prophet (SA) stopped this forever in one moment with one sermon.
[Shia-sect believes that not the Prophet (SA) but Hz. Omar (RA) stopped
it later; so they are still continuing. Lots of victims are there in Iran
today]. While
only seven Sahabis could free 39,259 slaves (REF-4), Hakim Bin Hazam freed 200
slaves (REF-5), the number was high enough to capture the power later and
establish the Mamluk Dynasty. THE
UNFORTUNATE FACT
IS THAT
THOSE KINGS
THEMSELVES DID NOT
UPROOT SLAVERY. (Our women
suffered more in Hasina-Khlada period, and still suffering).
We will refer to Sahi Bokhari extensively here because it is accepted as
authentic, as Maolana Abdur Rahim [from Pirozpur Bangladesh, the only South-East
Asian Member to OIC (Organization of Islami Conference) stated, “All the
Hadises of Bokhari and Muslim are acceptable” (REF-6). In fact, there are more
than 40 Hadises on slavery in Vol-3 of Sahi Bokhari alone, apart from some
scattered ones in other of total of 9
volumes. As
most of the males of the non-Muslims were killed in/after the battles, a big
part of Islami slaves were necessarily women and girls. We see the Prophet (SA)
sending the captured women and children to Syria and Iraq for sale (REF-23). If I/you imagine myself/yourself with my/your mother among
those unfortunate women/children on the long way day and night to Syria/Iraq
only to be sold in the slave-market, we probably will realize a portion of their
pain as well as Islam’s attitude towards humanity. And how do you feel like
being gifted to a new Master? Specially girls?
Well, a property can surely be gifted. Maria Kibtia was the gifted slave
to none but the Prophet (SA) by the king of Egypt and the Prophet (SA) accepted
it. Muslim men are allowed to have
sex with unlimited number of slave-girls (Sura Ma’arij-30, Sura Mu’minun 6,
7). So gifting them to new Masters
meant their definite destinations to new men in new beds.
These are not folk stories but bare facts and realities of devastated
human lives. And the Qura’an is totally silent about the right of sex of their
female Mistresses with male slaves. It
was presumably not allowed. This
may seem as clear violation of Islam’s claimed gender-equality and justice. 1. The
following also may seem in clear confrontation with Islam’s declared social
and gender based equality. (a)
A
slave and a Master can never be equal, (Sura Room –28).
The Qura’an gave the Masters a higher social status and does not object
to the Masters if they do not give so much to slaves that they become equal (Sura
Nahl -71). (b)
The
social discrimination between a free woman and a slave girl is reflected in the
Islamic Jurisprudence in their different punishments in case of adultery after
marriage of both. The Qura’an in this case punishes the slave-wife with
“half the punishment” of a free-wife (Sura Nisa-25).
{And then there
is a Hadis with all-time instruction to flog slave-girls for adultery for 3 (or
2, The narrator was not sure) consecutive incidences. After the third (or
second), “Sell Her” (REF-16), which is again very different from the
Qura’anic punishment (Sura Nisa-
25 again)}. WHY
ISLAMIC PUNISHMENT FOR THE
SAME CRIME VARIES WITH SOCIAL
STATUS OF CRIMINALS? Just a logical
question, humbly waiting for centuries for acceptable answer. (c)
If
a man is able to marry a free woman, it is “Makruh” (“Not So Good”, -
according to some Imams) or “Haram” (“Forbidden” -according to some
other Imams) to marry a slave-girl. (REF-8).
I did not find anything about a Mistress marrying her male slave, may be
women were not/could not be Mistresses or they were not allowed to marry their
slaves.
(a)
If you leave out or break fast in Ramadan, free slaves. - (REF-2) (b)
If you break some promise
of fasting, free your slaves as the price, “Kaffara”– (REF-2 again). (c)
If you cause abortion by hitting the mother, one of the ways is “Diyat”,
(the price of killing, must be approved by authority) which is payment with
slaves (REF-3). (d)
If there is Solar or Lunar Eclipse, set the slaves free. (REF-11) (e)
While fasting, if you intentionally impute Allah or Prophet (SA), free
slaves (REF-25). (f)
Zakaat (2.5% of yearly savings) can be used to purchase slave/s to set
free. (REF-27). Many slaves
surely got the precious freedom of life from all of the above.
Although in some other cases Islam established equality between rich and
poor [[as in leadership, Eid day or in the congressional (Jamaat) prayers]],
here in this case the poor could not enjoy the privilege simply because they
could not afford slaves. So are the
cases of slaves themselves. The rich could get out of punishment and the poor
were to be punished for the same crime. A
similar is the situation with Hajj; the poor never get the chance of cleaning
all past sins and become “sinless”.
IN
THE ABOVE, HUMAN
BEINGS WERE
CLEARLY USED
AS “COINS”
TO “BUY”
FORGIVENESS / BLESSING FROM
GOD. {{The same was in
Sonaton (Hindu) Dhormo in the old system of buying girls (from family as well)
and devoting them to the temples as “Sheba Dashees” to gain God’s
blessing. The worst example is “Noroboli”, slaughtering humans to gain
god’s blessings (Specially Maa-
Kaalee)}}. Was the condition of slave-girls bad?
No, it was not. It was not even worse.
It was the worst possible.
HOW IF
SHE HAD
MANY MASTERS
TO SATISFY ??
DIFFERENT BEDS
IN THE
SAME NIGHT??
YES, THE SYSTEM OF MULTIPLE MASTERS
WAS A NORM OF THE ISLAMI
SOCIETY, PROVED
BY MANY
HADISES (REF-9). Let me show
it by quoting from one of them: - “He
used to give his verdict regarding the male or female slaves owned by more than
one Master………Ibn ‘Umar narrated this verdict from the Prophet (SA).”(
Vol-3, Hadis#702). Were
those slave-girls goats or what? PLEASE
DO NOT BYPASS THIS
POINT, EDUCATE
US ABOUT
THE STATUS
OF THOSE
SLAVE-GIRLS (OF MULTIPLE MASTERS) AS “”ASHRAFUL MAKHLUKAT””.
Also please explain “ All good from Allah, all bad from you (REF-28).
The devastation and insult to humanity completes and continues with the
Islamic legality; THE CHILDREN
OF SLAVE - GIRLS
BECOME SLAVES
OF THE
SAME MASTER.
(REF-10). Period.
End of the story. Now
I want to draw your attention to a serious point. Islam allows slavery, but
makes visible humanitarian approaches to free slaves in different
reasons/occasions as shown above. Also
Islam asked Muslim to consider slaves as “brothers”, (never as
“Sisters”), to treat them equally with food etc., and not to overload
them with heavy work (REF-15). Also the Masters were told about “Double
Reward” if they would educate/ free and marry the slave girls (REF-17, 18
& 19). Prophet’s (SA) extreme
agony about slaves even in his gasping condition before death, was immensely
heart touching. He was too sick to
talk properly, still he was cautioning Muslims about slaves.
Also in his sermon in the Last Hajj he strongly mentioned about it. WHILE
THOSE ARE ADVICES / INSTRUCTIONS, ISLAM
ALL ALONG STRENGTHENED
SLAVERY IN DIFFERENT INVISIBLE WAYS.
HOW? PLEASE
READ ON. (1)
Slaves were assets, just like properties of financial value.
Naturally, having more slaves as children form the slave-girls served as sweet
bonus and encouragement for the Master to have “free assets as slave
children” on the top of free sex with unlimited number of slave-girls.
Thus slavery was strengthened invisibly, as shown in Ref-10. (2)
THERE IS NO “ZAKAAT” ON SLAVES (REF-12). Thus the rich people were
encouraged to “invest” money on salves as properties.
Effort of saving money is a natural instinct. Many Sunni Muslims in
Pakistan declare themselves in the Banks as “Shias” to avoid the law of
Zakaat on the interest. (Shias do not pay Zakaat; they pay “Khums”, more in
amount than Zakaat. But the Banks control only Zakat, not “Khums”). Again,
slavery was strengthened invisibly. (3)
Slaves would be rewarded “twice” if s/he served both God and Master
properly (REF-13 & 14). Slaves
were thus psychologically stopped from revolting.
Slavery was again strengthened invisibly. (4)
There cannot be a worse punishment for a believer if s/he is told before
the prayer “None of his/her
optional/compulsory good deeds of worship will be accepted”.
Well, “IF
A SLAVE
BEFRIENDS ANYBODY ELSE
WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF HIS/HER
EX-MASTER, HIS/HER NO
WORSHIP WOULD BE
ACCEPTED”-(REF-20). One
more invisible chain was put around their necks of the slaves. (5)
NO WORSHIP OF A SLAVE WOULD BE ACCEPTED IF S/HE RUNS AWAY FROM HIS/HER
MASTER UNTIL S/E RETURNS TO HER/HIS MASTER. (REF- 21). This is a very dangerous
proposition, the climax of Islam’s utmost invisible effort to strengthen the
institution of slavery. A slave may
run away for many reasons, including threat on life. But Islam did not consider
the attitude/behavior/torture of the Master. A
good presentation of humble defense about Islam’s slavery is in many books
including the book of Syed Kutub, a strong believer Muslim and Ex Chief Justice
of Egypt, who was later imprisoned and hanged by court for his open mind. The
defense says that Islam did not uproot slavery because it did not want to shake
the entire economic system of that time based on the free labor of the slaves,
but Islam through other socioeconomic systems tried to ensure that slaves should
not be produced at all. But even if
the socioeconomic utopia Islam promises could stop slavery, the continuous
generation of slave-kids would endlessly give new life to slavery anyway.
Readers may comment on it. Another
line of defense is with examples of famous Islami Scholars of that time who were
slaves. The argument is: - Slave-system produced many scholars.
But this “many” is extremely small. These scholars were the produce
of a combination of their personal talent combined with kind Masters.
They were exceptions, not examples.
Where is the record that how many talents were crushed under the boots of
not-so-kind Masters? Also we have
the record of a talented slave-boy who later became a Big-Shot of Basra and
“created” the famous Hadis against Women-Leadership in Islam. (REF-22).
He was Abu Bakra, the slave boy from Tai’f
{not Hz. Abu Bakar (RA)}. Of
course slaves were tortured and physically beaten.
“The Prophet (SA) said: - None of you should beat your wives like your
slaves. And make love with them in the night”
( REF-24). Mankind
walked through sun and shower for many centuries to uproot this evil and
succeeded recently. The success did not come with the help of any divine
religion, especially Islam, rather in spite of Islam’s institutional support
to slavery. I leave it to the hearts and heads of the readers to conclude. The
problem is: - 1.
On many social aspects Islam has both useful and harmful instructions (as
applied today, may be some of those were “good” at that time).
2.
It is not stated which is the final instruction, (as is clearly stated in
the case of drinking). 3.
It is not stated which is eternal and which was revealed for only for a
particular situation of that time. 4.
A huge institution of 1.2 billion Muslims is running without any kind of
central command/control. 5.
Things are dangerously left to people’s interpretation and judgment to
pick and apply. 6.
As a result different and opposite decisions of Islami leadership on the
same issue confused the Muslim world all through. “Unreal Islam” is only a
by-product of this difference, one group attributing to the other. The opposite
“Fatwa”s of Islami Leadership about 9/11 is a bright example. Back
to slavery. If you see I am
watching a child drowning, and you know that I am able to save him, and you see
that instead of saving I am pushing him more under the water, what will you
think of me? Islam knew it well how
tremendously humanity suffers due to slavery.
I just showed what Islam did about the drowning child. Our Maolanas have
nerves. They still defend the un-defendable but their effort never goes beyond
“better than others”. Indeed
that is only a “comparison between two rotten eggs” (excellent expression of
Abul Kasem). CONCLUSION:
- This article shows one of the visible, real and practical sides of Islam’s
attitudes towards humanity, reflected today in cruel laws of Islami Sharia
towards freethinkers, non-Muslims and women.
Islam’s other side is full of good advice. But these social/familial
advices were there in humane conscience and commonsense long before Islam; those
do not need anything divine to conceive and apply. Most of Muslims since
centuries were/are peace loving and pass their lives with all those positive
social aspects. They were/are not effected by the negative social aspects
because those are not told. Also
those are not compatible with common peace loving commoners. Only SOME Maolanas
time to time get “inspired” by those negative aspects and cause trouble to
both non-Muslims and Muslims themselves. With
time, the Muslim populace will overcome it with education and commonsense.
Criticisms of social evils of Islam will no longer be necessary. We
are only trying to bring that beautiful hour as quickly as possible so that
fewer people suffer. All the rest
is either misrepresentation from us, or misunderstanding from the other side. Thanks. REFERENCES REF
- 1
Page – 1255 of A. REF
- 2
Laws #1669, 1674, 1681 of B. REF
- 3
Hadis# 2630, 2631 of C. REF
- 4
Page - 1257
of A. REF-
5
Hadis# 715
Vol.3 of
D. REF
6
Page -- 449
of E. REF-
7
Page - 150 of
H. REF
- 8
Page 242 of A. REF
- 9
Hadis#697, 698, 699, 701, 702, 703 & 704 –Vol-3 of D. REF
– 10
Page 242 of A. REF
- 11
Hadis# 695, 696 Vol 3 of D. REF
- 12
Hadis#1108 of C., Hadis# 542, 543
of Vol-2 of D. REF
- 13
Hadis# 2388 of C. REF
- 14
Hadis# 255 of Vol-4 of D. REF
- 15
Hadis# 2617, Page 720 of
C. REF
- 16
Hadis# 73, Vol-3 of D. REF – 17
Hadis# 255, Vol 4 of
D. REF
- 18
Hadis# 720
Vol 3 of D. REF
- 19
Hadis# 2386 of C. REF
- 20
Hadis# 94, Vol 3, Hadis#404 of Vol 4
of D. REF
- 21
Page –377 of G. REF
- 22
F (a) ,
F (b). REF
- 23
Page -112
Vol. 3 of H. REF-
24
Hadis#2468 of
C. REF-
25
Law# 1675 of B. REF
- 26
page-104, Hadis#289 of C. REF
- 27
Law#1933 (v) of B. REF
- 28
Page-267 of A. A.
Translation/Edition of
the Holy Qura’an in Bangla- Maolana Muhiuddin
Khan.
B. Islamic Laws –Ayatullah Al uzama Syed Ali Al-Hussaini Seestani. C.
Compilation of Sahi
Bokhari in Bangla - Md. Abdul Karim
Khan.
D.
Translation of Sahi
Al-Bukhari in English – Dr. Md Muhsin Khan – University of Medina.
E.
History of compilation
of Hadis – Maolana Md. Abdur Rahim.
F.
(a)The Forgotten
Queens of Islam – Fatima Mernissi.
(b)
“NOT FOR
YOU, WOMEN!”- NFB, 18th
June 2000.
G.
Ruhul Qura’an –
Maolana Abdud Daiyan
H.
Translation of Kasasul
Ambia- MaolanaBashir Uddin and Maolana Badiul Alam.
|