|
|
|
|
Reason
Can we build a world civilization on shaky foundations? Can we erect the palace of human prosperity on lies? The world is aching and its pain and anguish is augmenting day after day. The cause of its tribulation is disunity, apathy and intolerance. The symptoms of which are the wars that are taking lives, devastating families and shattering dreams. This small planet shall never see one day of peace and tranquility, until we don’t learn to accept each other as humans and love each other as if we were members of one family. Our peace and security shall never be realized unless and until we abandon the doctrines that advocate hate. How can you promote tolerance let alone unity when people follow doctrines that asks them to hate? Islam is not preaching peace but war. It calls the faithful to wage wars against the unbelievers, kill them and subdue them until Islam become the only religion in the world. Islam is not a religion that could allow diversity of thoughts and beliefs. It demands conformity and exerts control over the thought of its subjects. Any deviation is punished by death. All dictatorships are harmful but religious dictatorship is the worst of all. All political doctrines, whether leftist or rightist, once proven false, are abandoned, but religious fallacies endure, because they are believed to be from God and therefore infallible. “The heaven and Earth can pass but the word of God won’t” says the Bible. Rational people are willing to accept its irrationality and philosophers endeavor to rationalize and legitimize them for intellectuals' consumption. But lies are lies, no matter how elaborated they are and how long they have survived. General acceptance of a lie, dose not make it truth, nor universal rejection of truth would eclipse its splendor. There are some religions that believe in snakes and cows as sacred beings, others believe in spirits. These seem illogical to those who don’t believe in them. Muslims accuse Christians for their belief in trinity that to them seems ludicrous. Yet they have no difficulty believing in the absurdities of Quran like the Jinns, the creation of Eve from the rib of Adam, the story of Noah or the splitting of the Moon. It is not clear why all the unreasonable faiths are wrong and theirs is right! If we do not use reason to distinguish which faith is the true one, how we could pick the right religion? There are myriads of faiths that are all irrational yet all say that their faith is above reason? Even rational people are willing to accept the irrationality of religions. They give preference to revelation wherever their faith and their reason collide. They maintain that revelation is the ultimate source of the Truth. This is basically the thesis of all religious people. If that were so, which revelation is the true one? Why they differ? How can one be certain that this religion is right and others are not? If faith should be irrational, why our irrationality should be preferred and not that of others? Only through reason we would know which way is the right one. And when we test the religions with reason all of them fail miserably.
Limitations of Reason However, reason is not the only means of learning. Intuition and inspiration can take us where reason cannot. Some claim that through sudden flashes of inspiration, gates of knowledge are flung open in front of them and they can peep into a mystical world where they learn things they have not dreamed of. But this is very much different with the claims of the prophets who pretend to have received revelations and demand that their utterly irrational and fictitious concoction of fantasies be accepted as the ultimate and undisputed truth. Yes, inspiration is the most powerful source of understanding, but this is not reserved to a selected individuals. Almost everyone can develop this faculty and become the recipient of mystical knowledge. However the important thing to remember is that what we learn through inspiration is never illogical or irrational. Many scientists and inventors claimed to have received the answer to their questions intuitively. In fact still it is reason that would determine whether we actually had a true flash of inspiration or simply we let our imagination take over. Religious people dismiss logic
when it contradicts what they believe to be the word
of God. They say: "why rely on human logic that is
proven to be fallible when we can trust the word of
God that is infallible?" I have no doubt that people are
sincere in their search for Truth. No one chooses to be
misled willingly. It is foolish to assume that people
instinctively know the truth and choose to rebel
because they have pride in themselves. As absurd this
thought may be, this is what Muslims believe of those who do not believe in
Islam. Muslims are convinced that people are either are ignorant of Islam or
they reject it due to their pride. What a foolish thought! To what extent of
irrationality these people are willing to go to beguile themselves and keep
their irrational faith alive is beyond me. The fact is that people
everywhere, sincerely and honestly, take wrong paths
and clash with each other, are willing to sacrifice
their own lives for it (except for Muslims who prefer
to sacrifice the lives of others first) because they
do believe that they have found the Truth. Then one
may ask: "If they are
all sincere why they all don’t follow the same
religion?" It is because their understanding is
different. They rely on their own logic. Since they
are humans and their logic, just like yours and mine,
is defective, they choose wrong paths, they follow a
wrong guru, and they pray to a wrong god. If every one
else is prone to such mistake why should you or I be
exempt? This is an important question. This humbling
realization that the Truth is much greater to be
understood by an imperfect human being like me makes
me accepting of other people, listen to what they
have to say, be less arrogant and more aware. I cannot believe people based on the intensity of their beliefs. Everyone has faith in his own religion, but not all of them can be right. So what should I do? Even if I want to find the true God I have to use my own logic. I have to question, and make sure that I am not being misled. This is an important decision, if I have to give my entire control and my will to a god, shouldn’t I ascertain that he is the right one? How can I do that if I don’t question and use MY OWN logic? I say my own logic because I am responsible for my own life and I cannot follow another human being blindly for he too may be following someone else blindly. However, when I bring into equation my logic to evaluate these sects and religions to find the true God, I realize that none of them can withstand the test of logic. The so called prophets claim that it is not up to man to test God but it is up to God to test man. But if we don't question the validity of their claims, how are we supposed to know that they are not impostors? How we know that these self proclaimed prophets are not con artists and swindlers? Yet so many, otherwise intelligent people, let themselves be fooled by this bogus intimidation. As scary as it may be, we are left alone to chart our own lives and make our own decisions. Do we make mistakes? Of course we do. But we correct them and we move forward. On the other hand imagine the incalculable harm that would befall us if people followed blindly, not your God, who is of course the "true one", but another version of deity preached by another cult, (e,g, Sun M. Moon, Children of God, Temple of Sun, etc.). Which route is safer? When I choose to follow God (assuming there is a God who has send me a messenger to show me the right way) I am playing the Russian roulette. And since there are thousands of denominations, each selling salvation, all of them but one leading to perdition, my chances of finding the right one is pretty slim. You see why logic is the king? You have to test your god with logic first before submitting yourself to him. And since no religion or doctrine has presented a god that can hold firm to a good logical probing, I reject all of them as fancies of human imagination and products of our own making. The evolution of the human
society is not unlike the evolution of one of its
members. We evolved through adaptation and nature’s
test and trial .
Genes are constantly changing and each
change brings a new mutation. Most of these mutations
fail, but those few that succeed are the triumphs of
Mother Nature. The same thing happens in our society,
we make laws based on our particular needs, and change
them when they are no more needed. Some laws are good,
some are not. But they are made by us and they are for
us. Religious laws are made by men who lived eons
apart from us. They did not have a clue of the needs
of our time. Their social teachings look repressive to
us and the rest of their message is
illogical. Which one is better? Which one to
follow? Unless you prove, through logic, that your
religion is different, and your god is the real one,
you are also following a cult. By Ali Sina |